Search for: "THOMAS KNOLL"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2020, 6:16 pm
The attorneys at the Law Offices of Thomas L. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505), reported here. [read post]
21 Feb 2003, 9:04 am
Knoll [no homepage currently available] of the University of Pennsylvania Law School [official website] and Thomas D. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:30 am
Online 267 (2015) Stevanie Neuman (Missouri), Thomas Omer... [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:33 am
” As far as Thomas, he sits and reads for days. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
On June 20, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
On June 20, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas dissented. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
The case arose after Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), faced with significant budget cuts, laid off thirty-one workers. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm
Seattle attorney Knoll Lowney argues that his three clients, all affected by Princess Cruise Line’s and its parent Carnival Corporation’s pollution, want more transparency in the case. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:02 am
Tucker, Drexel University, Thomas R. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
Justice Thomas partially dissented. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, setting forth its interpretation of the burden of proof in such cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:58 pm
Seattle attorney Knoll Lowney argued in the writ filed in the Eleventh Court of Appeal that Judge Seitz committed error by summarily denying his clients their rights under the CVRA without explanation and without conducting an evidentiary inquiry, or making findings of fact or conclusions of law. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 8:34 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, involved a reduction in force at a government contractor that designs naval nuclear reactors. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:34 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, involved a reduction in force at a government contractor that designs naval nuclear reactors. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Kennedy and joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch, the Court overturned its earlier precedents and rejected the physical presence requirement. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
For example, Justice Clarence Thomas asked California’s lawyer whether his state could ban products from other states that have “different political views on certain issues that are important to your voters. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Three members of the Court—Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Barrett—read the Court’s undue burden precedents narrowly not to permit balancing, at least in cases involving “ordinary consumer goods” or when the benefits and burdens are incommensurables, such as with the California pork regulations, where the benefits are largely noneconomic—and, specifically, are moral—but the costs are mostly economic. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm
First, the Supreme Court could, as Justice Clarence Thomas advocates, eliminate dormant Commerce Clause review. [read post]
